Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast (2025 - 2031)
By Surgical Procedure;
Orthopedic, Urology, Spinal, Neurovascular, and Otolaryngology Surgery.By Type;
Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, and Electromyography.By Source;
In-house, Outsource, and Telehealth.By Modality;
Evoked Potentials, Electroencephalography (EEG), Carotid Endarterectomy, Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping, Epilepsy Surgery, Anesthesia Depth Monitor, and Electromyography (EMG).By Methods;
Invasive Non-invasive, and Minimally invasive.By Geography;
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031).Introduction
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market (USD Million), 2021 - 2031
In the year 2023, the Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market was valued at USD 2,444.17 million. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 4,439.42 million by the year 2030, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.9%.
As surgical techniques become increasingly intricate and delicate, particularly in neurosurgery, the demand for advanced monitoring solutions to safeguard neural structures and functions has surged. IONM serves as a crucial adjunct to surgical procedures, providing valuable insights into the integrity and functionality of the nervous system throughout the operation. The market for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring encompasses a diverse array of technologies, ranging from electrophysiological modalities such as electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG), and evoked potentials (EP), to imaging techniques like intraoperative neuroimaging and neuro-navigation systems. These modalities enable surgeons and neurophysiologists to assess neural activity, detect anomalies, and make informed decisions in real-time to mitigate potential risks during surgery.
The rising prevalence of neurological disorders, coupled with the growing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques, has bolstered the demand for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring systems. These systems not only enhance patient safety and surgical precision but also contribute to better post-operative outcomes and reduced healthcare costs by minimizing the likelihood of neurological deficits and complications. Technological advancements, such as the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and portable monitoring devices, are revolutionizing the landscape of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, enabling seamless integration into surgical workflows and expanding accessibility in diverse healthcare settings.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market Recent Developments
-
In July 2024, Soterix Medical received FDA 510(k) clearance for its MEGA-IOM system, designed to enhance intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM). The system offers integrated monitoring of both central and peripheral nervous systems, using tools such as motor and sensory evoked potentials, EEG, and direct nerve stimulation to reduce postoperative risks and improve outcomes. Its modular design allows customization for various surgical needs, with options for portable or cart-based setups. Soterix also provides training and certification to support U.S. adoption.
-
In June 2024, The Neuro-IOM/Solo, an innovative 8-channel IONM system featuring a touchscreen, has been launched specifically for surgeon use. It offers monitoring through 8 bipolar channels, making it ideal for endocrine, maxillofacial, and ENT surgeries. The device simplifies the monitoring process significantly.
Segment Analysis
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) Market has been segmented by surgical procedure, type, source, modality, and methods, each of which plays a crucial role in shaping the market’s growth and adoption.
The Surgical Procedure segment includes a wide range of surgeries where neurophysiological monitoring is crucial. It encompasses procedures such as spinal surgeries, neuro surgeries, orthopedic surgeries, vascular surgeries, cardiothoracic surgeries, and ENT surgeries. Spinal surgeries are one of the largest segments, as the risk of nerve damage is significant. Neuro surgeries, which include brain surgeries like tumor removal or epilepsy surgeries, also represent a major application of IONM to help preserve brain function. The increasing adoption of IONM in orthopedic and vascular surgeries, where the preservation of nerve function is vital, also drives market demand. Cardiothoracic surgeries and ENT surgeries are progressively adopting IONM, ensuring patient safety and reducing complications during procedures. These applications highlight the crucial role of IONM in improving surgical outcomes by preventing nerve injury.
The Type segment refers to the monitoring modalities utilized during surgeries. This includes electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), electromyography (EMG), and electrical nerve conduction velocity (NCV). EEG is widely used in neuro surgeries to monitor brain activity and ensure that critical areas are not damaged during procedures. SSEPs and MEPs are essential for assessing the functional integrity of the spinal cord and motor pathways during spinal surgeries. EMG is used in identifying motor nerve injury risk, especially in orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures. These types of monitoring systems help reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits and improve the safety of patients undergoing various surgeries.
The Source segment refers to the equipment or devices used for monitoring, typically categorized into intraoperative monitoring systems and stand-alone systems. Intraoperative systems are designed to provide continuous, real-time monitoring during surgeries, while stand-alone systems are typically used in a preoperative or postoperative setting for diagnostic purposes. The increasing use of intraoperative monitoring systems during complex surgeries has led to growth in the demand for advanced, real-time monitoring systems. This trend is particularly prominent in high-risk surgeries such as brain and spinal surgeries, where the potential for nerve damage is significant.
The Modality segment is further divided into electrophysiological monitoring and non-electrophysiological monitoring. Electrophysiological monitoring is the dominant method, relying on the measurement of electrical activity in the nervous system to assess the health of neural structures during surgery. Non-electrophysiological monitoring, such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and imaging, is gaining traction but remains a smaller segment. Electrophysiological modalities like MEPs and SSEPs remain central to the growth of the IONM market, especially in high-risk procedures where continuous nerve monitoring is essential.
Finally, the Methods segment encompasses the specific techniques and approaches used in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. These methods include continuous monitoring, threshold-based monitoring, and short-duration monitoring. Continuous monitoring involves the ongoing tracking of neural function throughout the surgery, providing real-time alerts if abnormal changes are detected. Threshold-based monitoring focuses on detecting significant changes in neural activity that exceed predefined thresholds, helping prevent nerve damage. Short-duration monitoring may be used in less invasive procedures or as part of post-operative care.
In conclusion, the segmentation of the global intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring market into surgical procedures, type, source, modality, and methods highlights the broad applications and advanced technologies involved. The increasing complexity of surgeries and the need for improved patient outcomes continue to drive the demand for advanced monitoring systems, making this market pivotal for enhancing surgical safety and reducing the risks of neurological complications.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Segment Analysis
In this report, the Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Surgical Procedure, Type, Source, Modality, Methods, and Geography.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Surgical Procedure
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Surgical Procedure into Orthopedic, Urology, Spinal, Neurovascular, and Otolaryngology Surgery.
Orthopedic surgery involves procedures related to the musculoskeletal system, such as joint replacement surgeries, fracture repairs, and corrective procedures for skeletal deformities. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in orthopedic surgery helps assess nerve function and integrity during procedures that involve proximity to nerves, minimizing the risk of nerve injury and post-operative complications. Urology surgery encompasses interventions related to the urinary tract system and reproductive organs, including surgeries for conditions such as kidney stones, prostate cancer, and urinary incontinence. Neurophysiological monitoring in urology surgery aids in preserving neurological function, particularly in procedures involving delicate structures like the pelvic nerves.
Spinal surgery focuses on treating disorders of the spine, such as herniated discs, spinal stenosis, and spinal cord injuries. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is integral to spinal surgery, as it allows surgeons to monitor spinal cord and nerve root function in real-time, reducing the risk of neurological deficits and optimizing surgical outcomes. Neurovascular surgery addresses conditions affecting the blood vessels of the brain and spinal cord, including aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), and ischemic strokes. Neurophysiological monitoring in neurovascular surgery aids in identifying and mitigating potential complications, such as ischemia or vessel injury, during complex procedures involving delicate vascular structures.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Type
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Type into Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, and Electromyography.
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique used to record electrical activity in the brain. In intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, EEG provides real-time information about brain function, including changes in electrical patterns that may indicate alterations in consciousness or cerebral perfusion. EEG is particularly valuable in neurosurgical procedures involving the brain, such as tumor resections or epilepsy surgery, where monitoring cortical activity can help prevent neurological deficits and guide surgical decision-making.
Evoked Potentials (EP) involve the measurement of electrical signals generated by the nervous system in response to external stimuli. Intraoperative EP monitoring assesses the integrity of sensory pathways, including visual, auditory, and somatosensory pathways, by eliciting responses to specific stimuli such as light flashes, auditory clicks, or electrical stimulation. EP monitoring aids in identifying and preserving critical neural structures during surgeries involving the brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nerves, minimizing the risk of sensory deficits or paralysis.
Electromyography (EMG) measures the electrical activity of muscles and peripheral nerves, providing insights into motor function and neuromuscular integrity. Intraoperative EMG monitoring is crucial in surgeries involving the spine, peripheral nerves, or neuromuscular junction, where it helps identify and preserve motor nerves, assess muscle function, and prevent post-operative motor deficits or paralysis.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Source
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Source into In-house, Outsource, and Telehealth.
The In-house segment refers to hospitals, surgical centers, and medical institutions that maintain their own dedicated IONM teams and equipment. These healthcare providers directly employ trained neurophysiologists and technicians to conduct intraoperative monitoring during surgeries. In-house IONM is typically preferred by larger hospitals and institutions that perform a high volume of surgeries, as it offers greater control over the monitoring process, quicker response times, and customized monitoring for specific surgical needs. This model also allows for closer integration with other clinical services and ensures continuous availability of trained personnel for high-risk surgeries, such as spinal and neuro surgeries.
The Outsource segment involves hospitals and surgical centers that do not maintain an in-house IONM team but instead contract external companies or third-party service providers to supply monitoring services during surgeries. These outsourced services typically come with a team of experienced neurophysiologists who provide the necessary monitoring equipment and expertise on-site during the procedure. This model is often used by smaller healthcare facilities or those with lower surgery volumes, as it allows them to access specialized IONM services without the need for maintaining dedicated staff or equipment. The outsourced model helps hospitals manage costs while still ensuring that high-quality monitoring is available for critical surgeries.
The Telehealth segment is an emerging trend in the IONM market, where monitoring is conducted remotely, allowing specialists to provide real-time oversight and consultation from a distance. In this model, intraoperative monitoring data is transmitted from the operating room to a remote location, where experienced neurophysiologists review the data and provide guidance to the surgical team. This approach can be particularly beneficial in settings where access to skilled IONM experts is limited or where specialized expertise is needed but not readily available on-site. Telehealth services provide flexibility and have the potential to expand the reach of high-quality IONM, especially in rural or underserved areas, while also helping to reduce operational costs for healthcare facilities.
In summary, the segmentation of the IONM market by source into in-house, outsource, and telehealth reflects different approaches to providing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring services. Each model offers distinct advantages in terms of cost, flexibility, and access to specialized expertise, with hospitals and surgical centers choosing the model that best fits their resources, surgical volume, and need for specialized care. The growing adoption of telehealth also indicates a shift toward more accessible and efficient delivery of IONM services, particularly in regions where there is a shortage of on-site specialists.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Modality
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Modality into Evoked Potentials, Electroencephalography (EEG), Carotid Endarterectomy, Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping, Epilepsy Surgery, Anesthesia Depth Monitor, and Electromyography (EMG).
Evoked Potentials (EPs) are commonly used in IONM to assess the functional integrity of sensory pathways and the nervous system during surgery. These tests involve the stimulation of sensory pathways and the measurement of the brain's electrical response, making them essential in surgeries where the spinal cord or brain is at risk. Evoked potentials are particularly valuable in spinal and neurosurgeries, helping to detect potential damage to critical neural pathways before it results in permanent injury.
Electroencephalography (EEG) is used to monitor the brain’s electrical activity during surgery, making it essential in procedures where brain function needs to be carefully tracked. EEG allows for the detection of abnormal electrical activity that could indicate a seizure or other complications during surgery. It is frequently utilized in neurosurgical procedures such as brain tumor resections or epilepsy surgery, providing real-time feedback to surgeons on brain health and function.
The Carotid Endarterectomy modality is employed during surgeries to treat carotid artery disease. It helps monitor the brain’s blood flow and neural function during the procedure, which is crucial in preventing stroke or other complications from reduced blood flow to the brain. This modality ensures that cerebral perfusion is maintained during the surgery, providing essential data to minimize risks.
Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping is a modality used in surgeries to treat brain aneurysms. Monitoring the patient’s neural function during these high-risk surgeries helps to avoid complications such as cerebral ischemia or other neurological damage. Real-time monitoring of evoked potentials and EEG during aneurysm clipping ensures that the brain remains adequately perfused and reduces the risk of postoperative neurological deficits.
Epilepsy Surgery is a specialized procedure that involves the resection of brain tissue in patients with refractory epilepsy. Intraoperative monitoring, including EEG, is used to track brain activity during the operation and ensure that critical brain areas are preserved while removing the tissue responsible for seizures.
The Anesthesia Depth Monitor modality is used during surgery to monitor the patient’s level of consciousness, ensuring the proper depth of anesthesia. This type of monitoring is critical in surgeries where it is essential to maintain an adequate balance of anesthesia to prevent awareness during surgery while also ensuring patient safety.
Electromyography (EMG) measures the electrical activity of muscles, and it is crucial in monitoring the functional integrity of motor pathways during surgery. EMG is commonly used in spinal and orthopedic surgeries to assess the risk of nerve damage and to guide surgical decision-making, helping to preserve motor function during procedures that involve nerves and muscles.
Each of these modalities provides essential information for surgeons, ensuring real-time feedback on the functional integrity of the nervous system during high-risk surgeries. By monitoring various neural functions, the use of these modalities in the Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market plays a critical role in improving surgical outcomes, reducing the risk of complications, and enhancing patient safety.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Methods
The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Methods into Invasive Non-invasive, and Minimally invasive.
Invasive methods involve direct measurement or observation of neural activity by placing electrodes or sensors inside the body, typically near the area being operated on. This method is commonly used for highly complex and high-risk surgeries, where detailed and continuous monitoring of neural pathways is critical. Invasive methods provide real-time feedback on the status of the nervous system, particularly in surgeries like spinal cord or brain surgeries, where the risk of nerve damage is significant. Invasive procedures are generally more accurate but come with a higher risk due to the direct intervention within the body.
Non-invasive methods are designed to monitor the nervous system without requiring any penetration of the body. These methods rely on external sensors or devices that detect electrical signals or other physiological changes in the body. Non-invasive techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potentials, are commonly used during procedures to monitor brain activity, muscle function, and nerve conduction without requiring invasive surgical intervention. These methods are generally considered safer and more comfortable for patients, making them suitable for a broad range of surgeries, including those involving the brain and spinal cord.
Minimally invasive methods combine elements of both invasive and non-invasive monitoring. These methods typically involve small incisions or the use of small probes that access the body with minimal disruption. The goal is to achieve precise neurophysiological monitoring while reducing the patient’s recovery time and the risk of complications associated with more invasive procedures. Minimally invasive methods are often used in surgeries like carotid endarterectomy or epilepsy surgery, where it is crucial to monitor neural activity with precision while minimizing the impact on the patient’s body. These methods strike a balance between the detailed data provided by invasive methods and the patient-friendly nature of non-invasive techniques.
Each method has its specific applications, advantages, and limitations depending on the complexity of the surgical procedure, the patient’s condition, and the desired level of monitoring. The Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market benefits from these varied methods, providing surgeons with the tools needed to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes during high-stakes surgeries.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, Segmentation by Geography
In this report, the Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market has been segmented by Geography into five regions; North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and Latin America.
Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market Share (%), by Geographical Region, 2024
North America stands out as a prominent market for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, driven by robust healthcare infrastructure, high adoption of advanced medical technologies, and a strong emphasis on patient safety and surgical quality. The presence of leading medical device manufacturers, research institutions, and healthcare facilities further fuels market growth in this region.
Europe also commands a significant share of the global market, characterized by well-established healthcare systems, a growing prevalence of neurological disorders, and increasing investments in surgical innovation and patient care. Stringent regulatory standards and a focus on evidence-based medicine contribute to the adoption of neurophysiological monitoring technologies across European countries.
The Asia Pacific region is witnessing rapid market expansion attributed to rising healthcare expenditure, expanding access to healthcare services, and growing awareness about the benefits of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Emerging economies such as China, India, and Japan are driving market growth, supported by investments in healthcare infrastructure and technological advancements.
In the Middle East and Africa, market growth is driven by improving healthcare infrastructure, rising demand for advanced surgical procedures, and a growing focus on enhancing patient safety and surgical outcomes. However, challenges such as limited access to healthcare services and economic constraints may impede market growth to some extent.
Latin America presents opportunities for market expansion fueled by increasing healthcare spending, rising prevalence of neurological disorders, and efforts to modernize healthcare infrastructure. However, market growth may be tempered by economic volatility, regulatory complexities, and disparities in healthcare access across the region.
Market Trends
This report provides an in depth analysis of various factors that impact the dynamics of Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market. These factors include; Market Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities.
Drivers:
- Surgical Complexity
- Demand for Safety
-
Technological Advancements - One of the key drivers of technological advancement in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is the development of high-definition electrodes and sensors capable of capturing neural signals with unprecedented clarity and resolution. These advanced sensors enable more accurate and reliable monitoring of neural activity, facilitating real-time assessment of the nervous system's function during surgery.
The integration of advanced signal processing algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is revolutionizing the interpretation of neurophysiological data, allowing for automated detection of subtle changes in neural function and early warning of potential complications. AI-driven analytics can help clinicians make more informed decisions during surgery, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced risk of neurological deficits.
Miniaturization and portability of monitoring equipment are expanding the accessibility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in diverse clinical settings, including ambulatory surgery centers and remote locations. Portable monitoring systems enable real-time monitoring of neural function during procedures outside traditional operating rooms, enhancing patient safety and surgical precision. The integration of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with other imaging modalities, such as intraoperative MRI and CT scans, offers a comprehensive approach to intraoperative neuro-navigation and surgical guidance. These integrated systems provide surgeons with detailed anatomical and functional information in real-time, facilitating precise localization of neural structures and minimizing the risk of inadvertent injury during surgery.
Restraints:
- Cost Constraints
- Limited Awareness
-
Skill Shortage - The complexity of neurophysiological monitoring techniques necessitates specialized training and expertise to ensure accurate data acquisition, interpretation, and real-time decision-making during surgical procedures. Skilled personnel, such as neurophysiologists, neurologists, or technologists, are required to perform intraoperative monitoring tasks, including electrode placement, signal acquisition, artifact recognition, and response interpretation. Additionally, these professionals must possess a comprehensive understanding of neuroanatomy, electrophysiology principles, and surgical procedures to effectively assess neural function and anticipate potential complications.
There is a notable shortage of trained personnel with the requisite expertise in neurophysiological monitoring techniques, particularly in emerging markets and underserved regions. This shortage is exacerbated by factors such as limited educational resources, insufficient training programs, and the high demand for specialized healthcare professionals in other fields. As a result, healthcare facilities may face challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified staff capable of conducting intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, leading to potential gaps in patient care and surgical safety.
Addressing the skill shortage in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring requires concerted efforts from healthcare institutions, educational organizations, and regulatory bodies to develop comprehensive training programs, certification pathways, and continuing education opportunities for aspiring neurophysiological monitoring professionals. By investing in workforce development initiatives and fostering collaboration between academia and industry, stakeholders can mitigate the impact of skill shortages and ensure the availability of proficient personnel to meet the growing demand for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring services worldwide.
Opportunities:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Emerging Markets
-
Personalized Medicine - Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring plays a crucial role in the paradigm of Personalized Medicine by providing real-time insights into the unique neurophysiological responses of individual patients during surgical procedures. By monitoring neural function in real-time, clinicians can customize surgical approaches and treatment strategies to optimize outcomes while minimizing the risk of adverse events and complications.
One key aspect of Personalized Medicine in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is the customization of monitoring protocols and modalities based on the specific needs and characteristics of each patient. This may involve tailoring the selection of monitoring modalities (such as EEG, EP, or EMG) to the particular surgical procedure, patient's medical history, and neurological risk profile. Additionally, personalized threshold criteria for detecting changes in neural function can be established, allowing for early intervention and adaptive decision-making during surgery.
Advancements in technology, particularly in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, further enhance the potential for Personalized Medicine in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. AI algorithms can analyze complex neural data in real-time, enabling the detection of subtle changes in neural function and predicting patient-specific responses to surgical interventions. This facilitates proactive decision-making, allowing surgeons to anticipate and mitigate potential risks before they escalate.
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Key players in Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market include:
- IntraNerve (US)
- NeuroMonitoring Technologies (US)
- ProPep Surgical (US)
- Sentient Medical Systems (US)
- Accurate Monitoring LLC (US)
- Natus Medical Incorporated (US)
- NuVasive (US)
- Medsurant Holdings (US)
- Inomed Medizintechnik GmbH (Germany)
In this report, the profile of each market player provides following information:
- Company Overview and Product Portfolio
- Key Developments
- Financial Overview
- Strategies
- Company SWOT Analysis
- Introduction
- Research Objectives and Assumptions
- Research Methodology
- Abbreviations
- Market Definition & Study Scope
- Executive Summary
- Market Snapshot, By Surgical Procedure
- Market Snapshot, By Type
- Market Snapshot, By Source
- Market Snapshot, By Modality
- Market Snapshot, By Methods
- Market Snapshot, By Region
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market Dynamics
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Drivers
-
Surgical Complexity
-
Demand for Safety
-
Technological Advancements
-
- Restraints
-
Cost Constraints
-
Limited Awareness
-
Skill Shortage
-
- Opportunities
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery
-
Emerging Markets
-
Personalized Medicine
-
- Drivers
- PEST Analysis
- Political Analysis
- Economic Analysis
- Social Analysis
- Technological Analysis
- Porter's Analysis
- Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- Bargaining Power of Buyers
- Threat of Substitutes
- Threat of New Entrants
- Competitive Rivalry
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Market Segmentation
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Surgical Procedure, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Orthopedic
- Urology
- Spinal
- Neurovascular
- Otolaryngology Surgery
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Type, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Electroencephalography
- Evoked Potentials
- Electromyography
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Source, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- In-house
- Outsource
- Telehealth
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Modality, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Evoked Potentials
- Electroencephalography (EEG)
- Carotid Endarterectomy
- Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping
- Epilepsy Surgery
- Anesthesia Depth Monitor
- Electromyography (EMG)
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Method, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Invasive
- Non-invasive
- Minimally invasive
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Geography, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Nordic
- Benelux
- Rest of Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Japan
- China
- India
- Australia & New Zealand
- South Korea
- ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Countries)
- Rest of Asia Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- GCC
- Israel
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Argentina
- Rest of Latin America
- North America
- Global Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Market, By Surgical Procedure, 2021 - 2031 (USD Million)
- Competitive Landscape
- Company Profiles
- IntraNerve (US)
- NeuroMonitoring Technologies (US)
- ProPep Surgical (US)
- Sentient Medical Systems (US)
- Accurate Monitoring LLC (US)
- Natus Medical Incorporated (US)
- NuVasive (US)
- Medsurant Holdings (US)
- Inomed Medizintechnik GmbH (Germany)
- Company Profiles
- Analyst Views
- Future Outlook of the Market