Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market Growth, Share, Size, Trends and Forecast (2025 - 2031)
By Product Type;
Instruments, Reagents, and Others.By Technology;
Conventional Testing and Non-Conventional Testing.By Test Type;
Conventional Blood Culture Tests, PCR Method, Nucleic Acid Testing, Mass Spectroscopy, and Point-of-Care Testing.By End User;
Hospitals, Independent Diagnostics Centers, and Others.By Geography;
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and Latin America - Report Timeline (2021 - 2031).Introduction
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market (USD Million), 2021 - 2031
In the year 2024, the Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market was valued at USD 4,683.12 million. The size of this market is expected to increase to USD 7,769.53 million by the year 2031, while growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.5%.
The global bloodstream infection (BSI) testing market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the rising prevalence of infections, increasing healthcare expenditure, and advancements in diagnostic technologies. Bloodstream infections, which can lead to severe complications and high mortality rates if not promptly diagnosed and treated, are a critical concern for healthcare systems worldwide. The need for rapid and accurate diagnostic methods to identify pathogens responsible for these infections has become paramount, leading to a surge in demand for sophisticated testing solutions. As a result, the market for BSI testing is expanding, encompassing a variety of tests including conventional blood cultures, molecular diagnostics, and advanced automated systems.
Technological advancements play a crucial role in the development of the BSI testing market. Innovations such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field, enabling faster and more precise identification of pathogens compared to traditional methods. These cutting-edge technologies offer significant advantages, including reduced time to diagnosis, improved sensitivity and specificity, and the ability to detect a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. The integration of these technologies into clinical practice is driving market growth, as healthcare providers seek to improve patient outcomes through timely and accurate diagnosis.
Additionally, the market is influenced by several factors, including the increasing incidence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), the growing aging population, and the rising awareness about the importance of early detection and treatment of BSIs. Governments and healthcare organizations are investing in improving diagnostic infrastructure and implementing stringent guidelines to manage and prevent bloodstream infections. This, coupled with the growing demand for point-of-care testing and the expansion of diagnostic laboratories in emerging economies, is expected to further propel the market's growth. As the global focus on healthcare quality and patient safety intensifies, the bloodstream infection testing market is poised for substantial advancement in the coming years.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market Recent Developments
-
In July 2022, T2 Biosystems, Inc., a prominent firm that specializes in the early detection of sepsis-causing antibiotic resistance genes and microorganisms, has obtained a grant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for their T2Lyme panel. This panel empowers physicians to ensure prompt administration of suitable therapy to patients, simultaneously averting the adverse effects of treatment and the overuse of antibiotics.
-
In August 2022, a molecular diagnostic company, Immunexpress, Pty Ltd., launched SeptiCyte RAPID EDTA blood-compatible cartridges in European. The advanced SeptiCyte RAPID CE-IVD cartridge is a first-to-market hosts response technology which adds undiluted EDTA blood as a validated sample type demonstrating a significant development.
Segment Analysis
The Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market is segmented by Product Type, Technology, Test Type, End User and Geography, product type into instruments, reagents, and consumables. Instruments include automated analyzers, microbiology systems, and diagnostic machines used for blood culture testing and identification of pathogens. These instruments are increasingly favored for their efficiency, automation, and ability to deliver rapid, accurate results, essential in managing bloodstream infections. Reagents play a crucial role in detecting pathogens, with various chemical agents used to facilitate bacterial growth, identify specific pathogens, or detect biomarkers of infection. Consumables such as blood culture bottles, test kits, and sample collection devices are integral components of blood infection testing, driving consistent demand, particularly in high-volume clinical settings.
By technology, the market is segmented into conventional culture-based methods, molecular diagnostics, and immunoassays. Conventional culture-based methods remain the gold standard for blood stream infection testing, though they are time-consuming and may take up to 48 hours or more to yield results. In contrast, molecular diagnostics, including PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have significantly improved the speed and accuracy of pathogen detection, allowing for faster identification and more precise treatment decisions. Immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and lateral flow assays, are becoming increasingly popular for detecting specific biomarkers of infection, providing rapid, cost-effective options for initial screenings in clinical environments.
The end-users of bloodstream infection testing include hospitals, diagnostic laboratories, research institutions, and homecare settings. Hospitals represent the largest end-user segment due to the high volume of patients with suspected bloodstream infections, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) and emergency departments. Diagnostic laboratories are also key players, as they handle a large number of blood culture tests and specialized diagnostic services. Research institutions utilize blood infection testing to explore new diagnostic techniques and treatments for sepsis and other infections. Although still emerging, homecare settings are gaining attention as blood infection testing devices become more portable and accessible. Geographically, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa. North America leads the market due to its advanced healthcare infrastructure and high prevalence of bloodstream infections like sepsis. Europe follows closely, with increasing demand for rapid diagnostic solutions. The Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to experience the highest growth, driven by a rising burden of infectious diseases, improving healthcare access, and the adoption of advanced diagnostic technologies in countries like China and India.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Segment Analysis
In this report, the Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by Product Type, Technology, Test Type, End User and Geography.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, Segmentation by Product Type
The Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by Product Type into Instruments, Reagents and Others.
Instruments in the BSI testing market include a range of devices and equipment used for detecting and analyzing pathogens in blood samples. These can vary from simple manual tools to sophisticated automated systems designed for high-throughput testing. Examples include blood culture systems, PCR machines, mass spectrometers, and next-generation sequencing platforms. The advancement and adoption of these instruments are crucial for improving the accuracy, efficiency, and speed of BSI diagnosis.
Reagents are chemical substances and kits used in conjunction with diagnostic instruments to detect and identify infectious agents in the bloodstream. This segment includes culture media, stains, molecular reagents, and antibodies, among others. Reagents are essential for the performance of various diagnostic tests, including blood cultures, PCR assays, and nucleic acid amplification tests. The development of high-quality, reliable reagents is critical for ensuring the sensitivity and specificity of BSI testing.
The others category encompasses additional products that support the BSI testing process. This may include consumables like test tubes, pipettes, sample collection kits, and other laboratory accessories. It also covers software solutions used for data analysis, management, and reporting in diagnostic laboratories. These supporting products are integral to the workflow and operational efficiency of BSI testing, contributing to the overall effectiveness of the diagnostic process.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, Segmentation by Technology
The Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by Technology into Conventional Testing and Non-ConventionalTesting.
Conventional testing methods include traditional approaches such as blood culture techniques, which remain the cornerstone for identifying pathogens in blood samples. Blood cultures involve incubating patient samples in culture media to allow the growth of bacteria or fungi, followed by identification through biochemical tests. Despite being time-consuming (typically requiring 24-48 hours), these methods are highly reliable and widely used in clinical settings worldwide.
In contrast, non-conventional testing methods represent a newer generation of technologies that aim to overcome the limitations of conventional approaches, particularly in terms of speed and sensitivity. Non-conventional methods include molecular diagnostics such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nucleic acid testing (NAT), which detect microbial DNA or RNA directly from blood samples. These techniques offer rapid turnaround times (often within a few hours), high sensitivity, and the ability to detect a broader range of pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses, compared to culture-based methods.
Mass spectrometry is another non-conventional technology gaining traction in BSI testing. It enables the rapid identification of microorganisms based on their unique protein profiles, providing valuable insights into the causative agents of infections. Additionally, **point-of-care testing (POCT)** is emerging as a critical technology in the BSI testing market, allowing for near-immediate diagnosis at the patient's bedside or in decentralized settings. POCT devices are compact, user-friendly, and provide rapid results, facilitating prompt initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and improving patient outcomes.
The segmentation by technology underscores the dynamic landscape of BSI testing, where traditional methods coexist with innovative technologies aimed at enhancing diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and clinical outcomes. As healthcare systems strive to combat antimicrobial resistance and improve patient management, the adoption of advanced non-conventional testing methods is expected to grow, driving further innovation and market expansion in the BSI testing sector.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, Segmentation by Test Type
The Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by Test Type into Conventional Blood Culture Tests, PCR Method, Nucleic Acid Testing, Mass Spectroscopy and Point-of-Care Testing.
Conventional Blood Culture Tests involve the traditional method of detecting bloodstream infections by culturing blood samples in specific nutrient media. These tests are highly regarded for their ability to provide detailed information about the type of pathogen and its antibiotic susceptibility. Despite being time-consuming, often requiring 24 to 72 hours for results, they remain the gold standard for BSI diagnosis due to their accuracy and reliability. Automated blood culture systems have enhanced the efficiency of this method, reducing hands-on time and improving detection rates.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Method is a molecular technique that amplifies specific DNA sequences of pathogens, allowing for rapid and highly sensitive detection. This method significantly reduces the time to diagnosis compared to conventional blood cultures, often providing results within a few hours. PCR is particularly useful for detecting pathogens that are difficult to culture and for identifying antibiotic resistance genes, aiding in the timely initiation of appropriate treatments.
Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) encompasses various molecular techniques, including PCR, that detect the genetic material (DNA or RNA) of pathogens in blood samples. NAT is highly sensitive and specific, capable of identifying a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. This category includes advanced methods like quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR, which offer precise quantification of pathogen load, crucial for monitoring the severity of infection and response to treatment.
Mass Spectroscopy uses advanced technology to identify pathogens based on their unique protein profiles. Techniques like MALDI-TOF (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight) mass spectrometry are increasingly popular in clinical microbiology due to their rapid turnaround time and high accuracy. Mass spectroscopy can provide results in minutes to hours, significantly speeding up the diagnosis process and allowing for prompt treatment decisions.
Point-of-Care Testing refers to diagnostic tests performed at or near the site of patient care, such as at the bedside or in outpatient settings. These tests are designed to be quick and easy to use, providing immediate results without the need for complex laboratory infrastructure. Point-of-care testing is particularly valuable in emergency and remote settings, where timely diagnosis is critical for patient outcomes. Examples include rapid antigen tests and portable molecular testing devices.
Segmenting the BSI testing market by test type provides a comprehensive understanding of the various diagnostic approaches available, highlighting their respective advantages and applications in different clinical scenarios. This segmentation aids healthcare providers in selecting the most appropriate testing method based on the specific needs of their patients and the clinical setting.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, Segmentation by End User
The Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by End User into Hospitals, Independent Diagnostics Centers and Others.
Hospitals represent the largest segment in the BSI testing market. These healthcare facilities perform a high volume of tests due to the critical need for rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections in inpatient settings. Hospitals have the infrastructure and resources to support advanced diagnostic technologies, including automated blood culture systems, molecular testing platforms like PCR, and mass spectrometry. The need for timely diagnosis and treatment in acute care settings drives the demand for efficient and reliable BSI testing methods, making hospitals a key market segment.
Independent Diagnostic Centers are specialized facilities that provide comprehensive laboratory services, including BSI testing. These centers often serve a wide range of healthcare providers, including outpatient clinics, primary care practices, and smaller hospitals that may lack the in-house capabilities for advanced diagnostic testing. Independent diagnostic centers are equipped with sophisticated laboratory equipment and staffed by skilled technicians, enabling them to offer high-quality and rapid testing services. They play a crucial role in expanding access to BSI testing, particularly in regions where healthcare infrastructure is less developed.
Others encompass a variety of end users, including academic and research institutions, outpatient clinics, and home healthcare providers. Academic and research institutions utilize BSI testing technologies for clinical research, epidemiological studies, and the development of new diagnostic methods. Outpatient clinics and home healthcare providers increasingly adopt point-of-care testing solutions to facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment outside traditional hospital settings. This segment highlights the growing trend towards decentralized testing and personalized healthcare, where quick and accessible diagnostic tools are essential for effective patient management.
Segmenting the BSI testing market by end user provides insights into the diverse applications and needs across different healthcare settings. Understanding these segments helps manufacturers and service providers tailor their offerings to meet the specific requirements of each end-user group, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness and reach of BSI testing solutions.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, Segmentation by Geography
In this report, the Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market has been segmented by Geography into five regions; North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa and Latin America.
Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market Share (%), by Geographical Region, 2024
North America holds a significant share of the BSI testing market, driven by advanced healthcare infrastructure, high healthcare expenditure, and the widespread adoption of cutting-edge diagnostic technologies. The United States, in particular, is a major contributor due to the presence of numerous leading medical device companies and research institutions. The increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and the strong focus on early diagnosis and treatment are key factors propelling market growth in this region.
Europe is another prominent market for BSI testing, characterized by well-established healthcare systems and robust regulatory frameworks. Countries like Germany, the United Kingdom, and France are at the forefront, with high adoption rates of advanced diagnostic technologies such as PCR and mass spectrometry. The growing awareness about the importance of early detection and the implementation of stringent guidelines for infection control contribute to the market's expansion in Europe.
Asia Pacific is expected to witness rapid growth in the BSI testing market, driven by improving healthcare infrastructure, increasing healthcare expenditure, and rising awareness about infectious diseases. Countries such as China, India, and Japan are key markets, with significant investments in healthcare modernization and expansion. The large patient population, coupled with the increasing prevalence of bloodstream infections, creates a substantial demand for effective diagnostic solutions in this region.
Middle East and Africa present a diverse and growing market for BSI testing, with varying levels of healthcare development across different countries. The market growth is driven by increasing government initiatives to improve healthcare access, rising incidence of infectious diseases, and growing investments in healthcare infrastructure. Countries like Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the UAE are leading the adoption of advanced diagnostic technologies, aiming to enhance their capabilities in early diagnosis and treatment.
Latin America also shows promising growth potential in the BSI testing market, supported by the improving healthcare infrastructure and rising healthcare spending in countries such as Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina. The increasing burden of infectious diseases and the growing focus on enhancing diagnostic capabilities drive the demand for BSI testing solutions. Efforts to expand access to healthcare services and the adoption of advanced diagnostic technologies contribute to the market's development in this region.
Segmenting the BSI testing market by geography provides valuable insights into regional market trends, challenges, and opportunities. It enables stakeholders to develop region-specific strategies that address the unique healthcare needs and dynamics of each area, ultimately fostering the growth and advancement of BSI testing worldwide.
Market Trends
This report provides an in depth analysis of various factors that impact the dynamics of Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market. These factors include; Market Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities Analysis.
Drivers, Restraints and Opportunity Analysis
Drivers
- Rising Prevalence of Infections
- Increasing Healthcare Expenditure
- Technological Advancements
-
Rapid Diagnostic Methods - Rapid diagnostic methods represent a transformative approach in healthcare, particularly in the context of bloodstream infection (BSI) testing. These methods are designed to deliver quick and accurate results, enabling healthcare providers to promptly diagnose infections and initiate appropriate treatment strategies. Unlike traditional culture-based techniques that can take days to yield results, rapid diagnostic methods offer turnaround times ranging from minutes to a few hours, significantly reducing the time to diagnosis and improving patient outcomes.
One of the most prominent rapid diagnostic methods is PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), which amplifies specific DNA sequences of pathogens present in blood samples. PCR-based tests are highly sensitive and can detect even small amounts of genetic material from bacteria, viruses, and fungi. This capability is crucial for identifying pathogens that are difficult to culture or that require prompt intervention, such as in cases of sepsis. Rapid PCR tests have become essential in clinical settings where timely diagnosis is critical for effective patient management.
Mass Spectrometry is another advanced rapid diagnostic method increasingly used in BSI testing. Techniques like MALDI-TOF (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight) mass spectrometry can identify microorganisms based on their unique protein profiles. This method provides rapid species-level identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures, often within minutes. Mass spectrometry offers high accuracy and has the potential to streamline laboratory workflows, improving efficiency in diagnosing BSIs and facilitating targeted antimicrobial therapy.
Point-of-care (POC) testing is also revolutionizing BSI diagnosis by enabling rapid testing at or near the patient's bedside. POC tests are designed to be simple, easy to use, and deliver results within minutes, making them ideal for emergency departments, intensive care units, and remote healthcare settings. Examples include rapid antigen tests and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) that can detect specific pathogens directly from blood samples. POC testing enhances clinical decision-making by providing immediate diagnostic information, allowing healthcare providers to initiate timely treatments and improve patient outcomes.
Restraints
- High Costs of Advanced Diagnostics
- Limited Healthcare Access in Low-income Regions
- Complexity of Advanced Testing Techniques
-
Lack of Skilled Healthcare Professionals - The lack of skilled healthcare professionals is a significant challenge affecting various aspects of healthcare delivery, including the adoption and utilization of advanced diagnostic methods such as rapid diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections (BSIs). This shortage can impede the effective implementation and use of new technologies in several ways.
Training and proficiency in operating and interpreting results from rapid diagnostic tests require specialized knowledge and experience. Without a sufficient number of trained professionals, healthcare facilities may struggle to maximize the benefits of these technologies, leading to underutilization or misinterpretation of test results.
The complexity of some rapid diagnostic technologies, such as molecular techniques like PCR and mass spectrometry, demands a high level of technical expertise. Skilled professionals are needed not only to perform the tests accurately but also to troubleshoot potential issues and ensure quality control measures are upheld.
The ability to adapt to new technologies and integrate them into existing healthcare workflows requires healthcare professionals to stay updated with continuous education and training. In regions facing shortages of skilled personnel, healthcare systems may experience delays in adopting new diagnostic technologies or may rely on outdated methods, potentially compromising patient care and outcomes.
Addressing the lack of skilled healthcare professionals in the context of BSI testing requires concerted efforts from healthcare institutions, educational bodies, and policymakers. Investing in comprehensive training programs, offering incentives for specialized training in diagnostics, and fostering a supportive work environment that encourages professional development are essential steps towards overcoming this challenge. By enhancing the skills and capabilities of healthcare professionals, healthcare systems can better leverage rapid diagnostic methods to improve diagnostic accuracy, speed up treatment decisions, and ultimately enhance patient care.
Opportunities
- Expansion in Emerging Markets
- Innovation in Diagnostic Technologies
- Point-of-Care Testing Development
-
Telemedicine and Remote Diagnostics - Telemedicine and remote diagnostics represent a burgeoning frontier in healthcare delivery, offering transformative opportunities, particularly in the realm of diagnostic testing for conditions like bloodstream infections (BSIs). These technologies leverage telecommunications and digital health platforms to facilitate remote consultations, diagnosis, and treatment planning, thereby overcoming barriers of distance and improving access to healthcare expertise.
In the context of BSI testing, telemedicine allows healthcare providers to remotely assess patients, review symptoms, and determine the need for diagnostic testing. Remote diagnostics enable healthcare professionals to perform or interpret diagnostic tests, including rapid tests for BSIs, without the patient needing to be physically present in a healthcare facility. This capability is especially valuable in rural or underserved areas where access to specialized healthcare services may be limited.
Telemedicine platforms integrate various communication technologies, such as video conferencing, secure messaging, and digital imaging, to connect patients with healthcare providers in real-time. This facilitates efficient consultation and decision-making regarding the necessity and interpretation of BSI diagnostic tests. For instance, a patient in a remote location presenting with symptoms of sepsis could undergo initial assessment via telemedicine and subsequently have a blood sample collected locally for rapid PCR testing. The results can then be reviewed remotely by infectious disease specialists, enabling timely treatment recommendations.
Advancements in remote monitoring and wearable health technologies allow continuous tracking of patient vital signs and biomarkers, providing real-time data that can aid in early detection and management of BSIs. These technologies enhance the capabilities of telemedicine by enabling proactive healthcare interventions based on ongoing monitoring and analysis.
Telemedicine and remote diagnostics offer a promising avenue for expanding access to BSI testing, improving diagnostic accuracy, and optimizing patient outcomes by bridging geographical barriers and facilitating timely healthcare interventions, particularly in scenarios where rapid diagnosis and treatment are critical.
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Key players in Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market include;
- BioMerieux SA
- Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)
- AB Sciex
- IRIDICA
- Abbott Laboratories
- Cepheid Inc.
- C.R. Bard
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
In this report, the profile of each market player provides following information:
- Company Overview and Product Portfolio
- Key Developments
- Financial Overview
- Strategies
- Company SWOT Analysis
- Introduction
- Research Objectives and Assumptions
- Research Methodology
- Abbreviations
- Market Definition & Study Scope
- Executive Summary
- Market Snapshot, By Product Type
- Market Snapshot, By Technology
- Market Snapshot, By Test Type
- Market Snapshot, By End User
- Market Snapshot, By Region
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market Dynamics
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Drivers
- Rising Prevalence of Infections
- Increasing Healthcare Expenditure
- Technological Advancements
- Rapid Diagnostic Methods
- Restraints
- High Costs of Advanced Diagnostics
- Limited Healthcare Access in Low-income Regions
- Complexity of Advanced Testing Techniques
- Lack of Skilled Healthcare Professionals
- Opportunities
- Expansion in Emerging Markets
- Innovation in Diagnostic Technologies
- Point-of-Care Testing Development
- Telemedicine and Remote Diagnostics
- Drivers
- PEST Analysis
- Political Analysis
- Economic Analysis
- Social Analysis
- Technological Analysis
- Porter's Analysis
- Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- Bargaining Power of Buyers
- Threat of Substitutes
- Threat of New Entrants
- Competitive Rivalry
- Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities
- Market Segmentation
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By Product Type, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- Instruments
- Reagents
- Others
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By Technology, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- Conventional Testing
- Non-Conventional Testing
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By Test Type, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- Conventional Blood Culture Tests
- PCR Method
- Nucleic Acid Testing
- Mass Spectroscopy
- Point-of-Care Testing
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By End User, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- Hospitals
- Independent Diagnostics Centers
- Others
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By Geography, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Nordic
- Benelux
- Rest of Europe
- Asia Pacific
- Japan
- China
- India
- Australia & New Zealand
- South Korea
- ASEAN
- Rest of Asia Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- GCC
- Israel
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
- Latin America
- Brazil
- Mexico
- Argentina
- Rest of Latin America
- North America
- Global Blood Stream Infection Testing Market, By Product Type, 2021-2031 (USD Million)
- Competitive Landscape
- Company Profiles
- BioMerieux SA
- Becton Dickinson and Company
- AB Sciex
- IRIDICA
- Abbott Laboratories
- Cepheid Inc
- C.R. Bard
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
- Company Profiles
- Analyst Views
- Future Outlook of the Market